EntityOwner

While this update does indeed seem a bit rushed (which is a very touchy thing because if this plugin doesn't work it means having to wipe the map for some servers) I think your argument about OnUnload is not a good one.
You should never unload EntityOwner (or any building-tracking-plugin of that matter) manually because during the time the plugin is unloaded, no data will be stored, which might break compatability with other plugins.

 

I'm aware of this.

 

Also, to confirm your claims:

• FindEntityData still returns false for cupboards and /saveowners still reports "No changes" when building a cupboard
• /authclean still exists, but doesn't appear to work anymore.

 

Anyone else getting this?


(11:25:02) | 968725523

(11:25:03) | 1425970515

(11:25:11) | 1590173093

(11:25:11) | 1669257593

(11:25:12) | 2268399418

(11:25:13) | 1669257593

(11:25:22) | 1669257593

 

nice thank you Calytic

edit: TY Calytic. Running smooth as butter @ 240 players

 

Got A Question, is it better to use Entity Owners plugin or Building owners? I dont want to load hard our server - its like virtual server or something >50 slots

 

Depends on what you need.
EntityOwner has a larger footprint than BuildingOwners but actually tracks everything (like signs, chests, or whatever) instead of just buildings.
If you do not need the features provided by EntityOwner which aren't provided by BuildingOwners, then always err on the side of simplicity.
While I think that Catalytic is doing an amazing job, EntityOwner is still a HUGE plugin.
EntityOwner has roughly 2.5k lines of code while BuildingOwners only has 200.
EntityOwner is a lot more complex than BuildingOwners, and because of that, will inherently suffer more from bugs.
So, to sum it up: EntityOwner has a larger footprint and is a lot more complex than BuildingOwners, if you do not need the features provided by EntityOwner, you should use BuildingOwners.

 

Thanks for providing such good info, will stick to BuildingOwners, i mean it would be great to track all, but i think server would lag huge... But anyway thanks man!

 

I only said EntityOwner leaves a larger footprint.
That doesn't essentially mean that it performs worse or makes the server lag more.
You'd have to actually test it to see which causes more lag.

 

some of my players still have that building blocked thing. how do i fix it if i cant /authclean?

 

Well i cant say for sure that he had building blocked everywhere. But he said he has.
He was going to /sethome at his base, but wasnt able cause building blocked.
Sometimes it helps running away from the area and run back.
If this happens again i will give you more information.
Thanks for reply and a helpful plugin!

 

The issue of /removing a cupboard without auth'ing it is back. I saw in the update notes that was intentional. Is there a specific reason why the ownerdata is associated with it again? Have countless cases of people getting stuck with building block as a result.

 

Hey, I tried the old method of getting Entity Owner to work with the Remove tool but its not working anymore.. any ideas?

 

So, I finally made decision to move from BuildingOwners to this plugin. Testing this plugin on fresh-wiped test server. Made small building with cupboard and deployables in it. Testing commands:
"/prod2 block" gives this:

Code:

[2/8/2016 1:49:44 AM] [Oxide] 1:49 AM [Debug]   at Oxide.Plugins.EntityOwner.massProd[BuildingBlock] (.BasePlayer player) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Plugins.EntityOwner.cmdProd2 (.BasePlayer player, System.String command, System.String[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Plugins.EntityOwner.DirectCallHook (System.String name, System.Object& ret, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Plugins.CSharpPlugin.InvokeMethod (System.Reflection.MethodInfo method, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Core.Plugins.CSPlugin.OnCallHook (System.String name, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Core.Plugins.Plugin.CallHook (System.String hookname, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
[2/8/2016 1:49:45 AM] [Oxide] 1:49 AM [Info] [Logger] Rizzok :: /prod2 block

and "/prod2 storage" gives that:

Code:

[2/8/2016 1:52:36 AM] [Oxide] 1:52 AM [Debug]   at Oxide.Plugins.EntityOwner.massProd[StorageContainer] (.BasePlayer player) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Plugins.EntityOwner.cmdProd2 (.BasePlayer player, System.String command, System.String[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Plugins.EntityOwner.DirectCallHook (System.String name, System.Object& ret, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Plugins.CSharpPlugin.InvokeMethod (System.Reflection.MethodInfo method, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Core.Plugins.CSPlugin.OnCallHook (System.String name, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Oxide.Core.Plugins.Plugin.CallHook (System.String hookname, System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
[2/8/2016 1:52:37 AM] [Oxide] 1:52 AM [Info] [Logger] Rizzok :: /prod2 storage

owners_list.json:

Code:

[
  76561197971543022
]

entityowner_76561197971543022.json:

Code:

{
  "playerID": 76561197971543022,
  "Constructions": [
    "x1446.132y46.2609z343.9522",
    "x1444.6y46.2609z346.5311",
    "x1448.711y46.2609z345.4849",
    "x1447.179y46.2609z348.0638",
    "x1443.833y46.2509z347.8206",
    "x1446.412y46.2509z349.3533",
    "x1448.468y46.2509z348.8302",
    "x1450.001y46.2509z346.2513",
    "x1449.478y46.2509z344.1955",
    "x1446.899y46.2509z342.6628",
    "x1444.843y46.2509z343.1859",
    "x1443.31y46.2509z345.7648"
  ],
  "Deployables": [
    "x1450.001y46.2509z346.2513",
    "x0y0z0",
    "x1446.575y46.35091z346.1248",
    "x1447.502y46.35091z349.3764",
    "x1445.729y46.35091z343.131",
    "x1447.65y46.35091z347.0501",
    "x1444.009y46.35091z346.8012"
  ]
}